The French Contrast Method


WHAT IS THE FCM?

     The French Contrast Method (FMC) is an effective and less time-consuming strategy to improve physical performance, that is currently applied in sports that require high levels of force and neuromuscular power (Dietz & Peterson, 2012; Hernandez-Preciado et al., 2018). The FCM was originally developed by the Track & Field coach Gilles Cometti and consists of combining Complex and Contrast training methods in four consecutive exercises: a resistance exercise performed at a near maximal load, a plyometric exercise that mimics the same movement pattern, a resistance exercise trying to maximize the power production and, lastly, a plyometric or accelerated plyometric exercise (Dietz & Peterson, 2012). The FCM is a specialized method for specific season periods which pushes the physiological response of the athlete further and forces the utilization of alactic or anaerobic capacity to increase physical performance and develop gains in explosive performance (Dietz & Peterson, 2012).

HOW DO YOU PERFORM THE FCM?

EXERCISE 1 (STRENGHT)

     During the FCM, performing a heavy resistance exercise (>85% 1-RM) aims to increase the excitability of the central nervous system, and to produce a higher muscle contractile performance prior to a biomechanically similar explosive exercise (Dietz & Peterson, 2012). Previous research provides evidence to support the implementation of overcoming isometric maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) to provide a greater potentiation (Rixon, Lamont, & Bemben, 2007). For example, performing isometric MVCs (3 sets of 3 seconds) induces a greater potentiation than 1 set of a dynamic back squat at 90% 1-RM (Rixon et al., 2007). Interestingly, due to its static character, isometric MVCs with short muscle lengths (knee joint at 165º) is an important determinant to induce acute improvement in vertical jump performance (Tsoukos, Bogdanis, Terzis, & Veligekas, 2016). Furthermore, it has been shown that overcoming isometrics at a knee angle of 90º (long muscle length) produce higher levels of fatigue than at a shorter muscle length, such as 165º (Tsoukos et al., 2016). It is also well documented that isometric muscle contractions improve muscle stiffness (Burgess et al., 2007; Kubo et a., 2012). These adaptations are attributed to architectural alignment within the fibres in the tendon and allow to rapidly transfer force through the Stretch Shortening Cycle (SSC), a critical skill in sprint acceleration and Change of Direction Speed (CODS). Therefore, the immediate performance of a similar movement pattern following the isometric MVCs may enhance the transfer of the training (Verkhoshansky & Verkhoshansky, 2011).

EXERCISE 2 (PLYOMETRICS)

     The performance of plyometrics has been suggested as an important exercise to increase lower-body explosive strength (Asadi et al., 2016). Plyometric exercises involve jumping, hopping or skipping, and have a strong correlation with most common movements in many sports (e.g. basketball) as involves the application of the SSC (Saez-de-Villarreal, Requena, & Cronin, 2012; Asadi et al., 2016). Plyometrics involve a lengthening (eccentric contraction) of the muscle-tendon unit that is immediately followed by a shortening or concentric contraction, known as the SSC (Wilson & Flanagan, 2008). The SSC enhances the ability of the muscle tendon unit to produce maximal force in the shortest time period, through a greater stiffness (Maloney & Fletcher, 2018). Higher stiffness may improve neuromuscular performance during sprinting (Lopez-Mangini & Fabrica, 2016) or a COD (Serpell et al., 2014). Furthermore, the force-vector theory has recently highlighted the importance of applying the force in the desired direction (i.e. vertical, horizontal, lateral), to reach a physical performance improvement rather than just increasing the ground reaction forces (Contreras et al., 2017; Gonzalo-Skok et al., 2017). Thus, plyometrics training with a horizontal force application is an effective way to improve sprinting and CODS (Asadi et al., 2016; Gonzalo-Skok et al., 2018)

EXERCISE 3 (SPEED-STRENGTH)

     Once the plyometric exercise is completed, the athlete starts another resistance exercise to maximize the power production in the desired direction. It is during this exercise when the athlete develops explosive work capacity in a fatigued state (Dietz & Peterson, 2012). A primarily objective to improve acceleration performance is to optimize the GRF vector facilitating a horizontal propulsive orientation (Morin et al., 2011). Thus, athletes often train with resisted sprint through the performance of heavy sled towing (HST) (Petrakos, Morin, & Egan, 2015). Although sprint adaptations may be velocity specific to the loads applied (Petrakos et al., 2015), training with heavy loaded sleds [>30% body mass (BM)] leads the athlete to run in a more inclined horizontally-oriented position. Therefore, the athlete runs slower producing more horizontal force to the ground and reduces the mean vertical ground reaction forces (Jarvis, Turner, Chavda, & Bishop, 2017). Moreover, HST is an effective exercise to improve sprint, because it leads to similar neuromuscular adaptations to those required for improving sprint acceleration performance (Kawamori, Newton, & Nosaka, 2014). Research exploring the acute effects of HST (30%, 50% & 75% BM) has shown that it can potentiate acceleration over 0 – 15 metres (Jarvis et al., 2017; Wong et al., 2017) and subsequent sprint performance (Winwood, Posthumus, Cronin, & Keogh, 2016).

EXERCISE 4 (ASSISTED PLYOMETRICS)

     The FCM concludes with an accelerated or overspeed plyometric exercise. To improve neuromuscular power, we need both strength-dominant and speed-dominant exercises; thus, it is important to span the entire spectrum of the force–velocity continuum (Young, Talpey, Feros, O’Grady, & Radford, 2015b). For example, when sprinting the horizontal velocity of the body reaches 4 metres per second (m/s) within the first 5 metres, and increase to 6.8 m/s between 5 – 10 metres (Lockie, Murphy, Schultz, Knight, & Janse de Jonge, 2012). Furthermore, GCT are relatively short since the first step (0.21 seconds) and every step is getting shorter (Wild, Bezodis, Blagrove, & Bezodis, 2011); therefore, rapid SSC through the leg extensors is crucial in order to improve the performance. Regarding the force–velocity relationship, the speed of power exercises is relatively slow (2 – 4 m/s). Research indicates that even peak velocities of jump squats performed at maximum speed range between 2.6 – 3.7 m/s (Dayne et al., 2011). Interestingly, assisted jumping can increase the movement speed, by allowing a faster rate of shortening of the leg extensor musculature and a velocity overload during the jump (Sheppard, Dingley, Janssen, Spratford, Chapman, & Newton, 2011).

     To the best of our knowledge, the research by Hernandez-Preciado et al. (2018) is the only study assessing the acute potentiation effects of the FCM. The CMJ was assessed before and after the performance of a FCM in 31 athletes. The FCM protocol consisted of 3 sets of isometric partial squats, drop jumps, dynamic half-squats and hurdle jumps. CMJ height was measured 5 minutes after each set of the FCM. Hernandez-Preciado et al. (2018) report that, compared to baseline, the vertical jump performance improved by 5.1  1.1% after the first set, by 6.8  1.8% after the second set, and by 8.5  2.9% after the third set. These findings suggest that the FCM can be an effective method to acutely enhance the lower body’s force and power production.

PRACTICAL APLICATIONS:

  • The FCM is an effective and time-efficient strategy to improve explosive performance.
  • The FCM consists of combining four consecutive exercises: a resistance exercise performed at a near maximal load, a plyometric exercise that mimics the same movement pattern, a resistance exercise trying to maximize the power production, and a plyometric or accelerated plyometric exercise.
  • There is no “one size fits all”. The FCM should be applied during specific periods of the season with athletes and with enough training history.
  • Work through the entire spectrum of the force-velocity continuum is necessary to improve neuromuscular power.
  • Acute potentiation effect of lower body’s force and power production is developed after 3 sets of the FCM.


Asadi, A., Arazi, H., Young, W., & Saez de Villarreal, E. (2016). The Effects of Plyometric Training on Change-of-Direction Ability: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 11(5), 563-573. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0694

Burgess, K., Connick, M., Graham-Smith, P., & Pearson, S. (2007). Plyometric vs. Isometric Training Influences on Tendon Properties and Muscle Output. The Journal Of Strength And Conditioning Research, 21(3), 986. doi: 10.1519/r-20235.1

Contreras, B., Vigotsky, A., Schoenfeld, B., Beardsley, C., McMaster, D., Reyneke, J., & Cronin, J. (2017). Effects of a Six-Week Hip Thrust vs. Front Squat Resistance Training Program on Performance in Adolescent Males. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 31(4), 999-1008. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001510

Dayne, A., McBride, J., Nuzzo, J., Triplett, N., Skinner, J., & Burr, A. (2011). Power Output in the Jump Squat in Adolescent Male Athletes. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 25(3), 585-589. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181c1fa83

Dietz, C., & Peterson, B. (2012) Triphasic training: a systematic approach to elite speed and explosive strength performance. Hudson, WI.

Gonzalo-Skok, O., Sanchez-Sabate, J., Izquierdo-Lupon, L., & Saez de Villarreal, E. (2018). Influence of force-vector and force application plyometric training in young elite basketball players. European Journal of Sport Science, 1-10. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2018.1502357

Gonzalo-Skok, O., Tous-Fajardo, J., Valero-Campo, C., Berzosa, C., Bataller, A., & Arjol-Serrano, J., … Mendez-Villanueva, A. (2017). Eccentric Overload Training in Team-Sport Functional Performance: Constant Bilateral Vertical Versus Variable Unilateral Multidirectional Movements. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 12(7), 951-958. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0251

Hernandez-Preciado, J., Baz, E., Balsalobre-Fernandez, C., Marchante, D., & Santos-Concejero, J. (2018). Potentiation Effects of the French Contrast Method on Vertical Jumping Ability. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 32(7), 1909-1914. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000002437

Jarvis, P., Turner, A., Chavda, S., & Bishop, C. (2017). The acute effects of heavy sled towing on subsequent sprint acceleration performance. Journal of Trainology, 6(1), 18-25. doi: 10.17338/trainology.6.1_18

Kawamori, N., Newton, R., & Nosaka, K. (2014). Effects of weighted sled towing on ground reaction force during the acceleration phase of sprint running. Journal of Sports Sciences, 32(12), 1139-1145. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.886129

Kubo, K., Ikebukuro, T., Maki, A., Yata, H., & Tsunoda, N. (2012). Time course of changes in the human Achilles tendon properties and metabolism during training and detraining in vivo. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 112(7), 2679-2691. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011- 2248-x

Lockie, R., Murphy, A., Schultz, A., Knight, T., & Janse de Jonge, X. (2012). The Effects of Different Speed Training Protocols on Sprint Acceleration Kinematics and Muscle Strength and Power in Field Sport Athletes. Journal Of Strength And Conditioning Research, 26(6), 1539-1550. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0b013e318234e8a0

Lopez-Mangini, F., & Fabrica, G. (2016). Mechanical stiffness: a global parameter associated to elite sprinters performance. Revista Brasileira De Ci.ncias Do Esporte, 38(3), 303-309. doi: 10.1016/j.rbce.2016.02.004

Maloney, S., & Fletcher, I. (2018). Lower limb stiffness testing in athletic performance: a critical review. Sports Biomechanics, 1-22. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2018.1460395

Morin, J., Edouard, P., & Samozino, P. (2011). Technical Ability of Force Application as a Determinant Factor of Sprint Performance. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 43(9), 1680-1688. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e318216ea37

Petrakos, G., Morin, J., & Egan, B. (2015). Resisted Sled Sprint Training to Improve Sprint Performance: A Systematic Review. Sports Medicine, 46(3), 381-400. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0422-8

Rixon, K., Lamont, H., & Bemben, M. (2007). Influence of Type of Muscle Contraction, Gender, and Lifting Experience on Postactivation Potentiation Performance. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 21(2), 500. doi: 10.1519/r-18855.1

Saez-de-Villarreal, E., Requena, B., & Cronin, J. (2012). The Effects of Plyometric Training on Sprint Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 26(2), 575-584. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0b013e318220fd03

Serpell, B., Ball, N., Scarvell, J., Buttfield, A., & Smith, P. (2014). Muscle pre-activation strategies play a role in modulating Kvert for change of direction manoeuvres: An observational study. Journal of Electromyography And Kinesiology, 24(5), 704-710. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.06.008

Sheppard, J., Dingley, A., Janssen, I., Spratford, W., Chapman, D., & Newton, R. (2011). The effect of assisted jumping on vertical jump height in high-performance volleyball players. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 14(1), 85-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.07.006

Tsoukos, A., Bogdanis, G., Terzis, G., & Veligekas, P. (2016). Acute Improvement of Vertical Jump Performance After Isometric Squats Depends on Knee Angle and Vertical Jumping Ability. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 30(8), 2250-2257. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001328

Verkhoshansky, Y., & Verkhoshansky, N. (2011). Special strength training. Rome: Verkhoshansky SSTM.

Wild, J., Bezodis, N., Blagrove, R., & Bezodis, I. (2011). A Biomechanical Comparison of Accelerative and Maximum Velocity Sprinting: Specific Strength Training Considerations. UK Strength and Conditioning Association, (21), 23-36.

Wilson, J., & Flanagan, E. (2008). The Role of Elastic Energy in Activities with High Force and Power Requirements: A Brief Review. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 22(5), 1705-1715. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0b013e31817ae4a7

Comparte este artículo

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Eduardo Fernandez

Eduardo Fernandez

Eduardo Fernández es un preparador físico, con un master en Preparación Física por la Universidad de Northumbria.

Deja un comentario

Are you ready...

to perform?

2020 © Copyrights Reserved. Spaniard Performance

Si continuas utilizando este sitio aceptas el uso de cookies. más información

Los ajustes de cookies de esta web están configurados para "permitir cookies" y así ofrecerte la mejor experiencia de navegación posible. Si sigues utilizando esta web sin cambiar tus ajustes de cookies o haces clic en "Aceptar" estarás dando tu consentimiento a esto.

Cerrar